Difference between revisions of "Morris vs Sax"

From Landlordpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
'''Supreme Court Decision'''
 
'''Supreme Court Decision'''
*[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=mn&vol=apppub\0705\opa061188-0501&invol=1 Full Text (pdf)]
+
*[http://www.plol.org/Pages/Secure/Document.aspx?d=GvzQtzqlchbHMUgckdyq9g%3d%3d&l=Cases Full Text (pdf)]
 
'''Municipal Briefs in opposition''' - Knowing your opposition's tactics is a powerful tool
 
'''Municipal Briefs in opposition''' - Knowing your opposition's tactics is a powerful tool
*[[media:StBrief.pdf | St Paul]]
+
* [[Media:StPbrief.pdf|St Paul]]
*[[media:RocBrief.pdf | Rochester]]
+
* [[Media:Rocbrief.pdf| Rochester Brief]]
  
 
Back to [[Code enforcement/inspection]]
 
Back to [[Code enforcement/inspection]]

Latest revision as of 04:43, 18 June 2009

"Can a city force a landlord to put in things like bathroom ventilation and those special electrical outlets for kitchens?

In a Morris, Minn., case that could have far-reaching implications for municipalities all over Minnesota, the state Supreme Court said no." - TwinCities.com

Supreme Court Decision

Municipal Briefs in opposition - Knowing your opposition's tactics is a powerful tool

Back to Code enforcement/inspection